My
fourth novel, Perpetua’s Kin, will
appear this September. Those who know me know that this book has been a long while coming. For most writers of new literature, these are strange, hungry, inhospitable times. In this post I want to share why it’s taken so many years to publish Perpetua’s Kin and why I hope that if
you appreciate literature, you will read this novel.
I believe Perpetua’s Kin offers a uniquely affecting and surprising reading experience. And let me be clear. when I say I believe, I’m not talking about stubborn, run-of-the-mill confidence or
defensiveness (e.g., “I think it’s good!”). No, I’m talking about belief that comes of having paid the existential costs of the book’s composition and editing process.
You will
know what I mean if you’re a novelist and you’ve undergone a sacrificial,
years-long dedication to a book, i.e., to the act of writing, rewriting, effacing,
writing again, shaping, and drastically reshaping a raw mass of words until it
becomes a novel. Becomes is the
keyword here, for you do not make or
even write a novel so much as suffer
its convulsions, confusions, and convolutions until it emerges into clarity all
its own and becomes. In other words,
the novel becomes an artistic creation thoroughly and surprisingly itself — a creation apart from you,
which has answered to its own demands, and therefore, in some mysterious but
unquestionable way actually surpasses you: speaks in ways you don’t know how to
speak, knows more than you know, feels more than you feel.
All this
may seem esoteric to non-novelists, but some years ago, watching as my agent
sent this novel out among the “decision-makers” of the publishing world,
watching as it came back again and again, I began to understand that rather
than some innate problem in the book,
it was the book’s essential literary
merit — its autonomous completeness as an artistic creation — that
prohibited it from finding an advocate in mainstream publishing. This kind of
paradox is all too common in today’s publishing industry.
So I’m
releasing Perpetua’s Kin through
Atelier26 Books, the nationally recognized literary press I
founded some years ago in order to lift up good literary work. As the editor of
Atelier26 I’ve had the privilege of helping a number of marvelous authors bring
their books to readers. I believe deeply in the beauty and power of each Atelier26
book I’ve edited and published, and I can hardly describe how gratifying it’s
been to watch a few of these titles receive prestigious award recognition. I’m
proud to see Perpetua’s Kin join the
company of all the excellent works at Atelier26.
While
some of my own prior books have borne the Atelier26 logo, I’ve never actively
promoted any of them. Mainly they’ve served to bolster the Atelier26 catalog and
generate some extra proceeds for the press as a whole, while I’ve poured most
of my energy and focus as a publisher into supporting and promoting my other authors. Perpetua’s Kin will be different, which
brings me to confront anew that stamp of contempt used by so many literary folks who wish to stigmatize
and dismiss a book without even looking at it: self-published.
What does self-published
mean anyway?
I almost made that the parenthetical subtitle of this post,
because part of what I’d like to do here, in providing my own professional history and
personal perspective as an artist, editor, and publisher, is to complicate in
some small way the stubbornly prevailing, mostly snarky understanding of
“self-published author.”
Again, maybe
you’re a literary author yourself. Maybe, at this moment in your life you’d
never dream of self-publication. Maybe at this moment you’re riding high,
perhaps with your own work of new literature hot off the press from an
established commercial publisher big or small. Maybe your work has been
well-reviewed but not particularly hot in sales. I have first-hand experience
of those circumstances. You may find my story interesting.
So, with Perpetua’s Kin as a case in point, here’s
one way to publish a “new” novel in 2018:
- Between 2004 and
2007, publish 2 well-received novels with an established small
press;
- watch as
booksellers champion your novels (#1 Indie Next selection; Best of Indie
Next; Indie Next Book of the Year Finalist; staff picks);
- in what will
become the busiest 6 months of your life, fly from Oakland to Minneapolis,
from Oakland to Memphis, from Oakland to Seattle, from Oakland to Los
Angeles on a bona fide author tour through more than 15 U.S. cities,
meeting lots of folks who have read your book(s) or are buying a copy in
order to do so;
- speak publicly
before thousands of people collectively; lecture; teach;
- start that “new”
novel (novel 3) in February 2007, a year before your son’s birth;
- immerse yourself,
as you’ve always done, in novelistic research (in this case the history of the
telegraph; Civil War campaigns and prison camps; the geography of the U.S.
south) & travel from your home in Oregon to Missouri and Iowa for this
research;
- complete novel 3 & receive a publisher’s offer in 2010;
- wait, while your
NY literary agent submits the novel to other parties;
- undertake
your first Yaddo residency & start writing another novel (your fourth);
- continue writing
like hell, still awaiting responses to your agent's submissions of novel 3;
- receive the news
that the publisher of your first two books is cutting its operations way back;
- watch the whole
publishing ecosystem falter;
- watch newspapers
& magazines vanish & with them scores of book review
outlets;
- watch, dismayed,
as independent bookstores (many of those that hosted you on tour) go out
of business;
- notice that online star ratings & customer reviews now stand in for literary criticism;
- continue writing
like hell;
- meanwhile you
are your son’s primary at-home parent: he is an infant, he is a toddler,
he is in preschool, he is in kindergarten... ;
- establish a
publishing house called Atelier26 Books & try to help other writers by
editing, publishing, & promoting their work (you will devote your more-than-full-time
labor to this for years);
- return to Yaddo,
still writing like hell, and start your fifth novel;
- receive grants
& fellowships;
- learn that your
NY literary agent is retiring — you are now sans publisher and agent;
- rejoice to see
the rise of innumerable new & viable small presses & the opening of many new independent bookstores;
- marvel
that your son is in 2nd grade ... 3rd grade ... ;
- earn an MFA in
Creative Writing after 7 books & 20 years as a writer;
- entrust that
“new” novel — yes, novel 3, the one you started in 2007, a year before your son’s
birth — to Atelier26 Books in 2018, your son’s 10th year.
What does self-published mean, anyway?
Different things in different contexts.
I think
of Virginia Woolf. Was she self-published?
Woolf founded The Hogarth Press in order to publish works of prose or poetry “which
could not, because of their merits, appeal to a very large public.” Through
Hogarth, Woolf published other authors in addition to her own books.
I think
of Dave Eggers. Is he self-published?
Eggers founded McSweeney’s Books, which publishes other authors in addition to
Eggers’ own books. "McSweeney's exists to champion ambitious and inspired new writing, and to challenge conventional expectations about where it's found, how it looks, and who participates."
I think
of James Laughlin, poet and founder of New Directions. Was he self-published? From the start, New Directions was "dedicated to publishing quality works with little regard to their chances for commercial success." Laughlin published his own work and others, including F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Crack Up and the reissue of The
Great Gatsby when it went out of print. He also published work by Henry James, E.M. Forster, and Evelyn Waugh at a time when other publishers wouldn't touch them.
And I
think of other purportedly self-published authors. Among them are…Mark Twain,
Charles Dickens, Walt Whitman, Marcel Proust, Henry David Thoreau, Emily
Dickinson, Henry Adams, James Joyce, Laurence Stern, Jane Austen, Benjamin
Franklin, Carl Sandburg, Ernest Hemingway, D.H. Lawrence, Beatrix Potter, T.S. Eliot, e.e.
cummings, William Blake, Edgar Allan Poe …
This list
is far from exhaustive.
Am I self-published? There
was a time when this question might have worried me, but no more. I recently turned 40 and I have too much work to do.
But I
identify strongly with the author/publishers I mentioned above.
And as a
publisher custodian of Perpetua’s Kin
I’m also vigilantly aware of how problematic the perception and reception of
literary work can be, especially when that work is subjected to a loaded
catch-all like “self-published.”
So while I
realize that the reactions of readers and critics belong to the department of
things one can’t control, still I’m compelled to ask questions. My questions
are much like those asked by C.S. Lewis in his wonderful and wise 1961 book An Experiment in Criticism. How should
we judge the quality of a book? How might we assess literary merit and literary
taste? Despite its turgid title, Experiment
is written in a compelling, almost conversational way, and Lewis proposes
sensible and humane answers. He writes:
“The first demand any work of art makes upon us is surrender. Look. Listen. Receive. Get yourself out of the way.
(There is no good asking first whether the work before you deserves such a
surrender, for until you have surrendered you cannot possibly find out.)”
What does
self-published mean? Specifically,
what does it mean to you as a reader,
reviewer, bookseller, award judge, fellow writer — or whoever you may be in the
literary community? Is a self-published book
simply a book you can more easily and justifiably ignore? Are you
allowing labels — or stigmas — to obtrude upon your reading process and preempt
the recognition (and celebration!) of quality in works of new literature?
These questions fall to each of us. Especially in these times
of instability, confusion, and loss of morale in mainstream publishing — which are also times of countervailing independence, innovation, and vivacity among individual authors
and very small publishers — it falls to each of us to bear in mind what Lewis puts this way:
“We can judge any sentence or even word only
by the work it does or fails to do. The effect must precede the judgment on the
effect. The same is true of a whole work. Ideally, we must receive it first and
then evaluate it. Otherwise, we have nothing to evaluate.”
Dear
reader, it’s up to you.
And I’m
looking forward to sharing Perpetua’s Kin
with you. I believe it’s something special.
{See my full
author history HERE}