On the Smithsonian website, Ron
Rosenbaum offers
a lovely little profile of ex-
Harper’s editor Lewis Lapham and
his new(ish) editorial undertaking,
Lapham’s
Quarterly, that themed compendium of great writing from across the
centuries
.
Something of an e-iconoclast
myself, I particularly like the way Rosenbaum has framed Lapham’s mission with
the
Quarterly:
as a deliberate counter-assault on our Web-addled,
attention-deficit age by means of curated — and timeless — content.
The cavalry charge
that Lewis Lapham is now leading could be said to be one against
headlessness—against the historically illiterate, heedless hordesmen of the
digital revolution ignorant of our intellectual heritage; against the “Internet
intellectuals” and hucksters of the purportedly utopian digital future who are
decapitating our culture, trading in the ideas of some 3,000 years of
civilization for...BuzzFeed.
Here’s a quote from the 77-year-old
editorial visionary himself, for anyone needing reminding of what a gift this
man continues to be to the intellectual life of America (emphasis mine):
“I think
that the value [of LQ] is in the
force of the imagination and the power of expression. I mean ... the hope of social or political change
stems from language that induces a change of heart. That’s the power of words
and that’s a different power than the power of the Internet. And I’m trying
to turn people on to those powers and it’s in language.”
Rosenbuam writes:
Lapham
has no love for what web culture is doing. He laments Google for inadvertent
censorship in the way search engine optimization indiscriminately buries what
is of value beneath millions of search results of crap. Even if that was not
the purpose, it’s been the result, he avers.
“And that aspect of the Internet I think is going to get
worse.”
He
can sound a bit extreme when he says Facebook embodies “many of the properties
of the Holy Inquisition. I mean its
data-mining capacities. Or what Torquemada had in mind. I mean, the NKVD and the Gestapo were content
aggregators.”
Extreme? Read
Rosenbaum’s piece entire, then take a look at
Lapham’s Quarterly. Judge for yourself.